Shell dolls from my childhood. I didn’t make them

 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

UNITY vs. DIVISIVENESS

 Is a text inclusive or divisive? Does it serve to unify ideas through common forms and archetypes, or does it use standard literary devices (such as the Other and the Feminine Myth) as a means of identifying the differences among people? Critics have positioned themselves on both sides of this issue, to persuasive effect regardless of where on the continuum the critic chooses to position hum or herself. This paper will first address the critical position of  inclusiveness, then the polar opposite of divisiveness. Then it will address whether a synthesis of these two extremes can be achieved.  In what ways does a text function as a comprehensive mechanism? On the most basic level, in order to communicate clearly with another, common agreement on meanings and terms is required: A common unitary language is a system of linguistic norms" (Bakhtin,1198). But in order for literature to function on a higher level it must be Intergrated in such a way that all the parts serve the...
Read more
 Legalism in "Job" Job and his friends adopt a legalistic attitude toward their relationship with God, and as a result, God is displeased. God injures Job, not as a consequence of any sin he has committed, but because the Adversary doubts Job's motivation for living a "blamelesss and upright life." (1:8) The Adversary states to God about Job "Have you not hedged him round on every side with your protection, him and his family and all his possesions?" (1:10) The Adversary's argumentia that Job has a good relationship with God because he has not had his faith challenged.  Job leads a good life, and has no reason to be displeased with God. The Adversary claim s that to know Job's true feelings, God must test him, and that Job will fail the test. "But just stretch out your hand and touch all that he has, and see if he will not curse you to your face (1:11). God agrees to test Job, and Job's response is legalistic because he maintains that ...
Read more